Some could argue
to fly safely means to do so both sanely and efficiently. Some may also call
the current FAA requirements and psychological screenings sufficient, in
looking for said sanity and efficiency. My question to you is this: will there ever truly be a catch-all means to
identifying mental incompetence in regards to pilots or flightcrew? If I have a
bad day, week, or year, am I at risk for driving my car into a church on a
Sunday morning? Every single person on this planet has experienced mental or
physical discomfort in some way, but where do we draw the line from justified
reactions to mass murder? A person diagnosed (or undiagnosed) with mental
illness can find a way to justify every action he or she carries out. The magnitude
to which mental illnesses manifest in our brains is so vastly explored,
identified, and simultaneously unknown…
and yet screening for it can be rendered practically useless. Requiring an
employer to obtain a physical or mental screening in any career field can be
extremely beneficial in identifying various concerns, but it doesn’t solve
everything. Properly and honestly relinquishing the number of alcoholic
beverages you drink on an annual basis can be beneficial too… but that doesn’t
mean everyone actually admits to the amount they drink. My point is simple, and
it involves one of life’s most certain inevitabilities: people lie. The most unstable and cognizantly altered individual
has the ability to put on a show when necessary.
Not all accidents are attributed to
a deep-rooted psychological disorder. Sometimes a major life event that happens
can alter a mental state following a series of triggers. If I have an FAA
health screening on Tuesday, for example, but my parents die, my husband cheats
on me, and I get a flat tire on the way to work on Wednesday, am I still
technically “fit to fly” just because a piece of paper tells me I am? This is
an impossible process, and although there are often indicators and preventative
measures in terms of health evaluations to identify mental illness, the world of
life and death will never be the desired black and white.
Germanwings Flight
4U9525 is an extremely unfortunate example of a pilot suffering from a mental
illness. On March 24th, 2015, the first officer operating
Germanwings Flight 4U9525, Andreas Lubitz, deliberately crashed his aircraft
into the French Alps, killing all 150 people on board. Two months after
dropping out of a Lufthansa Flight Training Pilot School, Lubitz was diagnosed
and treated with antidepressants after experiencing thoughts of suicide. After
nine months of therapy, Lubitz was deemed fit to fly, but continued to receive
powerful drugs prescribed by his doctor. All the while, his fits of depression
and suicidal ideations were justified as being a result of moving away from his
family to pursue his dream of flying, in addition to the ringing in his ears
that he had been experiencing (tinnitus). Lubitz continued to pursue his goal
of flying, but failed to relinquish his past experience with depression and
suicide on his application for his student-pilot form. Although lying on the
form is illegal, Lubitz essentially received a slap on the wrist for not
disclosing his previous condition, and was given the opportunity to retake the
medical exam, of which he passed.
Lubitz eventually relapsed and started to experience symptoms that were described by doctors as being fearful, and
hypochondriacal in nature. To make matters worse, his family doctor and
psychiatrist were well aware of his issues, but failed to contact his aviation
medical examiner, even though they were authorized to do so. Flash forward to
Flight 9525, flying from Barcelona El Prat Airport, Spain to Dusseldorf in
Germany, after which Lubitz made the predetermination to take his own life via
the Germanwings Airbus A320 he was flying that day. When the captain of the
aircraft, Patrick Sondenheimer,
left the cockpit to utilize the restroom, Lubitz locked Sondenheimer out to carry out his
plan. Lubitz continued to descend at a rapid rate, ignoring all ATC commands
and radio calls. Sondenheimer attempted to break into the cockpit utilizing a
crowbar after receiving zero response from Lubitz. At 1041 hours at 403 miles
per hour, the right wing of Flight 4U9525 made impact with the side of the mountain, following the
deliberate crash and final resting point on the French Alps, subsequently
killing all 144 passengers and six crew members on board (Hammer, 2016).
While
death via suicidal airplane pilot is far less likely to occur than death
involving an automobile, the harsh reality still exists. In 1982, a depressed
Japan Airlines pilot traveling into Haneda Airport was institutionalized after
his failed attempt at bringing down his DC-8, which resulted in 24 passenger
casualties in the process. In 1998, an Air Botswana pilot in Gaborone who had
just been diagnosed (and grounded) with the AIDS virus, crashed his aircraft
into the other Air Botswana fleet (Bruggen, 2015).
Airline
captains are required to have a first class medical, whereas first officers
have the option of first or second class medical certificates (although most US
airlines require first class certifications regardless). Pilots are required to
go through a medical screening that is renewed every six months if the pilot is
forty years or older, and annually if the pilot is below the age of forty. In
order to receive the medical certificate, a pilot is required to complete an
application and physical examination with an FAA approved Aviation Medical
Examiner (AME). Throughout the duration of the appointment, the AME is required
to assess the pilots mental health to determine if they are fit and mentally
competent to fly (FAA, 2016). A pilot is required to disclose his or her
physical or mental conditions, but as I have so candidly explained: what if
they don’t? Many flyers operate with the fear of losing that ability to fly. If
we operated under the notion of helping
pilots, as opposed to threatening to ground them if they disclose suicidal
thoughts or depression, maybe we would have more people coming forward for help.
The FAA could try making professional help more readily available and accepted
across the ranks. If I admit to experiencing depression from a death in the
family, will I be grounded without pay? There needs to be a better incentive on
getting help without fear of repercussions.
In the same
respect, if the FAA takes a more liberal approach and there ends up being
another pilot related crash, the FAA will be under heavy scrutiny and the
public will want to know why they let that pilot fly. We want pilots to receive
the necessary help, but if they’re receiving treatment, appear to be fit to fly
again, and then cause an accident in the future (whether it’s intentional or
accidental), they will be looked at as if it was suicidal in nature. I can
easily compare this to law enforcement and policing, and this feels like a
lose-lose situation regardless of which way we steer it. Throughout my career in the military, I
dealt with my fair share of suicides, both ideations and completed in nature.
Two of the many situations actually involved police officers. In both instances
(which occurred at different time periods), friends of mine armed up for the
day with the required duty weapon, isolated themselves in a different location,
and utilized that weapon to take their own lives. Sure, we can look for
triggers, indicators, signs, etc. but in my experience, while there was always a trigger, sometimes it was
impossible to identify until after the event occurred. We give police offers
guns, provide pilots with planes, doctors with knives, and we have faith that
they will utilize those objects in the appropriately intended way. That was,
and continues to be the risk we face, and the harsh reality is that there is
nothing we can do to eradicate it. What type of baggage or psychological
arsenal do you bring to work each day?
References
Bruggen, P., & Persaud, R. (2015,
August 15). Inside the Mind of The Pilot Who Flies to Crash. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/slightly-blighty/201508/inside-the-mind-the-pilot-who-flies-crash
Federal Aviation Administration (2016, June 9). Fact Sheet:
Pilot Mental Fitness. Retrieved from https:// www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=20455
Hammer, J. (2016, February 22). The
Real Story of Germanwings Flight 9525. Retrieved from https://www. gq.com/story/germanwings-flight-9525-final-moments
SO TRUE! That’s where the problem lies, objects that are given to some can become a built-in risk factor. Mental health issues have always been a risk factor of concern to civil aviation regulators all over the globe. In 2010, the FAA allowed a special issuance consideration for persons using certain antidepressant medication. With that policy, they determined that the airspace would be safer with pilots who were having serious mental health symptoms. Pilots are passionate about flying, and sometimes that passion gets in the way of sound decision making, and a loss of a medical certificate is the first thing pilots think of. The FAA makes it seems as it’s a simple process in retaining your medical certificate, however that is not the case. At a minimum, you will need a detailed narrative summary of your history, treatment and prognosis from your treating physician. But that’s not the case they put you through the ringer and for this reason the stigma of the pilots’ mental health issues will continue.
ReplyDelete