In the 1960s, Jeff Bezo, Amazon and
Blue Origin CEO, began intriguing the public with Blue Origin’s idea to launch
private citizens 62 miles above the Earth in four-minute increments (Blum,
2015). Bezo wanted to transform the idea of a fantasy trip to space to an
accessible reality for everyone. Like Blue Origin, Pan Am took reservations
(but failed to deliver) for trips to the moon in 1969, further proving and
reiterating the public’s
interest in space travel. In November of 2015, Blue Origin landed its first
reusable rocket in space (Blum, 2015). Clearly space tourism has developed over
the years, but it has also experienced its fair share of setbacks along the
way.
In
1984 the first non-governmental employed astronaut, Charles D. Walker, explored
space, flying three times between 1984 and 1985. Space Adventures, founded in
1998, has allowed private civilians to travel beyond the stratosphere, spending
close to three months in space while traveling over 36 million miles. Space
Adventures was charging anywhere between twenty and forty million dollars for
the ability to explore space (Blum, 2015).
Despite
the many successes of space travel, there have also been detrimental setbacks.
On January 28th, 1986 the NASA Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart
73 seconds into its mission, unfortunately killing all seven members on board,
to include the schoolteacher Christa McAuliffe. Following the shuttle
disintegration as a result of an O-ring seal failure, NASA cancelled all of its
Space Flight Participant Programs at that time (Blum, 2015). In October of
2014, Virgin Galactic Spaceship Two fell to Earth after an attempt to explore
space. The crash created hurdles and public pessimism toward the idea of
exploration and tourism of space, including mixed feelings from the typically
optimistic Virgin Group Chairman Richard Branson. The crash killed one pilot
and severely injured another, significantly impacting the world’s perception on
space travel (Blum, 2015).
A
company making waves in this tourism industry is SpaceX, founded in 2002
by Elon Musk. Two weeks ago, SpaceX made history by launching the world’s fourth electric
car into space (Pearlman, 2018). As we’ve
learned, space tourism and exploration is constantly evolving. Just yesterday
SpaceX was at it again, successfully launching its Falcon 9 rocket. With an
attempt to save money and lower the cost of sending objects into space such as
people, SpaceX operates with the idea of rocket reusability to then utilize
that same part for other future missions. After they launched Falcon 9, they
attempted to catch the rocket’s
nose cone as it fell to the Earth’s
surface traveling eight times the speed of sound, but were unsuccessful (NPR, 2018).
In
January of 1984, President Ronald Reagan wanted to stimulate interest in the
commercial space industry by removing all the regulation barriers associated.
At that time, space industries had to go through as many as 17 approving
agencies prior to mission approval, so it was decided to designate the
Department of Transportation as the sole approving authority for space
exploration missions. Congress created the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984
in October of that year, which addressed licensing and regulation, access of
private launch companies to government facilities, and liability insurance
requirements (FAA, 2017). In 1986, US policy changed after the Space Shuttle
Challenger accident. Following the catastrophe, President Reagan reversed all
policies and issued a NSDD 254 which limited NASA’s role in providing commercial
launches to only those satellites that involved unusual foreign policy
considerations or unique shuttle capabilities (FAA, 2017).
Safety
and cost still plays an integral role in the development and success of tourism
in space. Since the establishment of the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984,
not only has it been amended twice, but two laws were incorporated by President Bill Clinton: Commercial Space Act of 1998 and Commercial Space Transportation
Competitiveness Act in 2000. The alternative to establishing a safe commercial
space operation leaves room for error and fatalities. I feel like the
exploration of space should be taken seriously with the utmost caution on all
parties involved to ensure a successful mission, regardless of whether or not
there’s
a physical pilot operating the vehicle. In my opinion, the rules could always
be more restrictive because we’re dealing with people’s lives.
I
think space tourism is absolutely feasible, and can consistently exist for more
than a one-time bucket list type of adventure in as early as ten years. I do,
however, think only the wealthiest of the wealthy will be able to partake in
the phenomena of space travel. Even with rocket reusability in effect, it is
still far too expensive ($20M+) for what I will call “normal” people to utilize
as a means of transportation. The knowledge and technology is there to launch
people into space, but more training, safety specifications, money,
regulations, and reliability needs to exist/be established before we can have a
fully functioning system.
To
work in the space tourism industry, a pilot must possess and carry an FAA pilot
certificate with an instrument rating. In addition, pilots with extensive
emergency training and crew coordination, like that of a military fighter pilot
or commercial airline pilot are ideal (Goehlich, 2013). Those skills, in addition to a more in-depth
supersonic and suborbital training will prepare a space tourism industry pilot.
According to Embry Riddle, generally the most qualified space tourism pilots
are prior single engine pilots and test pilots (graph featured below) from their experience (Goehlich,
2013). Virgin Galactic has been recruiting pilots from the commercial airliners
who typically have experience in multiple aircraft with more than three
thousand flight hours (Goehlich, 2013).
References
Blum, S. (2015, November 25). The Space Tourism Timeline.
Retrieved from https://www.inverse.com /article/8528-the-space-tourism-timeline
Federal Aviation Administration (2017). Origins of The
Commercial Space Industry. Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/about/history/milestones/media/Commercial_Space_Industry.pdf
Goehlich, R. A., Anderson, J. K., Harrold, N. N., Bemis, J.
A., Nettleingham, M. T., Cobin, J. M., Zimmerman,
B. R., Avni, B. L., Gonyea, M. D., & Ilchena, N. Y. (2013). Pilots For
Space Tourism. Retrieved from
https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&q=https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.
cgi? article%3D1001
%26context%3Dww-graduate-studies&source=gmail&ust=1519530418602000 &usg=AFQjCNG4XxFTKl_ uqyEf5LNCqCoUOSq_9w
National Public Radio, Inc. (2018,
February 22). SpaceX Completes Successful Launch, Narrowly Misses Catching $6 Million Nose Cone.
Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/02 /22/587933235/spacex-completes-successful-launch-narrowly-misses-catching-6-million-nose-cone
Pearlman, R. (2018, February 6).
SpaceX’s First Falcon Heavy Rocket to Launch 4th Electric Car to
Leave Earth. Retrieved from
https://www.space.com/g00/39606-spacex-falcon-heavy-fourth-car- space.html?i10c.encReferrer=&i10c.ua=1
I also feel that space tourism is feasible, to see it happen on a regular occurrence, within ten years, would be amazing. I think that space travel has been slower than I imagined it to be happening, after watching “Back to the Future” the 1980’s I was expecting flying cars and space travel being a regular means of travel in the early 2000’s, and was slightly disappointed why it was not taking place. You are right, that space travel is still far too expensive for the mass majority of people, and until that price comes down greatly, space travel will be moving too slowly to see a great change than what we are seeing with space travel presently.
ReplyDeleteYour succinct breakdown of the space tourism industry was a pleasant read. I definitely admired the distilled nature of your post. I too believe it is a feasible industry - for the wealthy. Although, I've come across alternate platforms for reaching outer space, albeit hypothesized, that involve the use of "space elevators, orbital tethers, edge of atmosphere space ports, piggy back launch systems, and high-altitude scram jet aircraft designs." They each have their own interesting merits and "astronomical" infrastructure costs for implementation, yet, high velocity ballistic payload ejection seems to be the tried and true method of the day. The exciting prospect is that within our lifetimes will almost certainly witness an expansion of space faring technologies; unfortunately, the majority of people will not be able to experience them personally. I hope to skydive from space one day - "space dive" - and has long stood in the top spot of my fantastical bucket list for quite some time. Nice post!
ReplyDelete-Aviator in Progress
Psychological Arsenal –
ReplyDeleteHopefully one day people can visit space for the cost of an airline ticket, I don’t think we will even see it in our lifetime. The 1986 Challenger trip to space had everyone’s attention because McAuliffe was a school teacher who was chosen from 11,000 applicants. Since all eyes were on her this accident had a huge significant impact on the nation. Even though space missions have always known to be in existence, this particular space mission would be disastrous of all because everyday people could relate to the teacher’s role as being a civilian onboard. I still remember that day, I came home from school and it was replaying repeatedly on the television. It just shows that all the hours in total for preparation that was put into this mission was gone in 73 seconds. Mistakes like this can’t be repeated, that’s why the development in safety comes at a high cost. Great post, this brought me way back!