Skip to main content

Commercial Space Industry


In the 1960s, Jeff Bezo, Amazon and Blue Origin CEO, began intriguing the public with Blue Origins idea to launch private citizens 62 miles above the Earth in four-minute increments (Blum, 2015). Bezo wanted to transform the idea of a fantasy trip to space to an accessible reality for everyone. Like Blue Origin, Pan Am took reservations (but failed to deliver) for trips to the moon in 1969, further proving and reiterating the publics interest in space travel. In November of 2015, Blue Origin landed its first reusable rocket in space (Blum, 2015). Clearly space tourism has developed over the years, but it has also experienced its fair share of setbacks along the way.
            In 1984 the first non-governmental employed astronaut, Charles D. Walker, explored space, flying three times between 1984 and 1985. Space Adventures, founded in 1998, has allowed private civilians to travel beyond the stratosphere, spending close to three months in space while traveling over 36 million miles. Space Adventures was charging anywhere between twenty and forty million dollars for the ability to explore space (Blum, 2015).
            Despite the many successes of space travel, there have also been detrimental setbacks. On January 28th, 1986 the NASA Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its mission, unfortunately killing all seven members on board, to include the schoolteacher Christa McAuliffe. Following the shuttle disintegration as a result of an O-ring seal failure, NASA cancelled all of its Space Flight Participant Programs at that time (Blum, 2015). In October of 2014, Virgin Galactic Spaceship Two fell to Earth after an attempt to explore space. The crash created hurdles and public pessimism toward the idea of exploration and tourism of space, including mixed feelings from the typically optimistic Virgin Group Chairman Richard Branson. The crash killed one pilot and severely injured another, significantly impacting the worlds perception on space travel (Blum, 2015).
            A company making waves in this tourism industry is SpaceX, founded in 2002 by Elon Musk. Two weeks ago, SpaceX made history by launching the worlds fourth electric car into space (Pearlman, 2018). As weve learned, space tourism and exploration is constantly evolving. Just yesterday SpaceX was at it again, successfully launching its Falcon 9 rocket. With an attempt to save money and lower the cost of sending objects into space such as people, SpaceX operates with the idea of rocket reusability to then utilize that same part for other future missions. After they launched Falcon 9, they attempted to catch the rockets nose cone as it fell to the Earths surface traveling eight times the speed of sound, but were unsuccessful (NPR, 2018).
            In January of 1984, President Ronald Reagan wanted to stimulate interest in the commercial space industry by removing all the regulation barriers associated. At that time, space industries had to go through as many as 17 approving agencies prior to mission approval, so it was decided to designate the Department of Transportation as the sole approving authority for space exploration missions. Congress created the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984 in October of that year, which addressed licensing and regulation, access of private launch companies to government facilities, and liability insurance requirements (FAA, 2017). In 1986, US policy changed after the Space Shuttle Challenger accident. Following the catastrophe, President Reagan reversed all policies and issued a NSDD 254 which limited NASAs role in providing commercial launches to only those satellites that involved unusual foreign policy considerations or unique shuttle capabilities (FAA, 2017).
            Safety and cost still plays an integral role in the development and success of tourism in space. Since the establishment of the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, not only has it been amended twice, but two laws were incorporated by President Bill Clinton: Commercial Space Act of 1998 and Commercial Space Transportation Competitiveness Act in 2000. The alternative to establishing a safe commercial space operation leaves room for error and fatalities. I feel like the exploration of space should be taken seriously with the utmost caution on all parties involved to ensure a successful mission, regardless of whether or not theres a physical pilot operating the vehicle. In my opinion, the rules could always be more restrictive because we’re dealing with people’s lives.
            I think space tourism is absolutely feasible, and can consistently exist for more than a one-time bucket list type of adventure in as early as ten years. I do, however, think only the wealthiest of the wealthy will be able to partake in the phenomena of space travel. Even with rocket reusability in effect, it is still far too expensive ($20M+) for what I will call “normal” people to utilize as a means of transportation. The knowledge and technology is there to launch people into space, but more training, safety specifications, money, regulations, and reliability needs to exist/be established before we can have a fully functioning system.
            To work in the space tourism industry, a pilot must possess and carry an FAA pilot certificate with an instrument rating. In addition, pilots with extensive emergency training and crew coordination, like that of a military fighter pilot or commercial airline pilot are ideal (Goehlich, 2013).  Those skills, in addition to a more in-depth supersonic and suborbital training will prepare a space tourism industry pilot. According to Embry Riddle, generally the most qualified space tourism pilots are prior single engine pilots and test pilots (graph featured below) from their experience (Goehlich, 2013). Virgin Galactic has been recruiting pilots from the commercial airliners who typically have experience in multiple aircraft with more than three thousand flight hours (Goehlich, 2013). 







References

Blum, S. (2015, November 25). The Space Tourism Timeline. Retrieved from https://www.inverse.com                         /article/8528-the-space-tourism-timeline

Federal Aviation Administration (2017). Origins of The Commercial Space Industry. Retrieved from                                https://www.faa.gov/about/history/milestones/media/Commercial_Space_Industry.pdf

Goehlich, R. A., Anderson, J. K., Harrold, N. N., Bemis, J. A., Nettleingham, M. T., Cobin, J. M.,          Zimmerman, B. R., Avni, B. L., Gonyea, M. D., & Ilchena, N. Y. (2013). Pilots For Space Tourism. Retrieved            from https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&q=https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.             cgi?                      article%3D1001 %26context%3Dww-graduate-studies&source=gmail&ust=1519530418602000                                    &usg=AFQjCNG4XxFTKl_ uqyEf5LNCqCoUOSq_9w

National Public Radio, Inc. (2018, February 22). SpaceX Completes Successful Launch, Narrowly Misses                     Catching $6 Million Nose Cone. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/02                /22/587933235/spacex-completes-successful-launch-narrowly-misses-catching-6-million-nose-cone

Pearlman, R. (2018, February 6). SpaceX’s First Falcon Heavy Rocket to Launch 4th Electric Car to Leave                     Earth. Retrieved from https://www.space.com/g00/39606-spacex-falcon-heavy-fourth-car-           space.html?i10c.encReferrer=&i10c.ua=1

Comments

  1. I also feel that space tourism is feasible, to see it happen on a regular occurrence, within ten years, would be amazing. I think that space travel has been slower than I imagined it to be happening, after watching “Back to the Future” the 1980’s I was expecting flying cars and space travel being a regular means of travel in the early 2000’s, and was slightly disappointed why it was not taking place. You are right, that space travel is still far too expensive for the mass majority of people, and until that price comes down greatly, space travel will be moving too slowly to see a great change than what we are seeing with space travel presently.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your succinct breakdown of the space tourism industry was a pleasant read. I definitely admired the distilled nature of your post. I too believe it is a feasible industry - for the wealthy. Although, I've come across alternate platforms for reaching outer space, albeit hypothesized, that involve the use of "space elevators, orbital tethers, edge of atmosphere space ports, piggy back launch systems, and high-altitude scram jet aircraft designs." They each have their own interesting merits and "astronomical" infrastructure costs for implementation, yet, high velocity ballistic payload ejection seems to be the tried and true method of the day. The exciting prospect is that within our lifetimes will almost certainly witness an expansion of space faring technologies; unfortunately, the majority of people will not be able to experience them personally. I hope to skydive from space one day - "space dive" - and has long stood in the top spot of my fantastical bucket list for quite some time. Nice post!

    -Aviator in Progress

    ReplyDelete
  3. Psychological Arsenal –
    Hopefully one day people can visit space for the cost of an airline ticket, I don’t think we will even see it in our lifetime. The 1986 Challenger trip to space had everyone’s attention because McAuliffe was a school teacher who was chosen from 11,000 applicants. Since all eyes were on her this accident had a huge significant impact on the nation. Even though space missions have always known to be in existence, this particular space mission would be disastrous of all because everyday people could relate to the teacher’s role as being a civilian onboard. I still remember that day, I came home from school and it was replaying repeatedly on the television. It just shows that all the hours in total for preparation that was put into this mission was gone in 73 seconds. Mistakes like this can’t be repeated, that’s why the development in safety comes at a high cost. Great post, this brought me way back!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Final Blog

A couple of months ago I wrote a blog regarding pilots and mental illness. If you can remember, I discussed the 2015 crash of Germanwings Flight 4U9525, and the extremely unfortunate example of the pilot, First Officer Andreas Lubitz, of whom suffered from a mental illness, which subsequently led to his deliberate crashing of Flight 4U9525 into the French Alps, killing all 150 on board (Hammer, 2016). That entire situation could have been avoided if the necessary steps were taken to not only get FO Lubitz the appropriate help he needed, but to also properly report his mental health decline by his family doctor and psychiatrist. For this post, I would like to revisit the mental illness topic, but I would like to switch gears and present a few questions regarding military pilots to include: why is military pilot depression and mental illness far less documented or known compared to the general public? Are their screening processes less stringent? Do more of them simpl

ATC Privatization

Our current Air Traffic Control system, run by the Federal Aviation Administration and funded by Congress, has an airspace comprised of 21 zones divided into individual sectors. These divisions include Air Traffic Control System Command Center (ATCSCC), Air Route Traffic Control Centers (ARTCC), the Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON), Air Traffic Control Towers (ATCT), and Flight Service Stations (FSS) (Freudenrich, 2018). President Trump wants to hand over this infrastructure to a private, nonprofit entity with its own board made up of federal officials, unions, airlines, and airports. The intent is for the FAA to oversee the private entity, which would be funded by user fees such as takeoff and landing charges, as opposed to the preexisting taxes on passenger tickets and fuel (Marshall, 2017).             Regardless of what happens, the Air Traffic Control system is in need of an upgrade. This upgrade comes in the form of what we call the NextGen system. Ne

Global Airlines: Is It a Fair Playing Field?

            The US-UAE Open Skies Agreement is an agreement established by the United States and the United Arab Emirates, allowing like the name suggests, open skies for both parties. Each party grants the other party certain rights and rules to be upheld while conducting their international air transportation, to include, but not limited to: a)      “The right to fly across its territory without landing; b)     The right to make stops in its territory for non-traffic purposes; c)      While entering, within, or leaving the territory of one Party, its laws and regulations relating to the operation and navigation of aircraft shall be complied with by the other Party's airlines; d)     While entering, within, or leaving the territory of one Party, its laws and regulations relating to the admission to or departure from its territory of passengers, crew or cargo on aircraft (including regulations relating to entry, clearance, aviation security, immigration,