Skip to main content

The Cargo Carrier Exemption

Should cargo carriers be exempt from flight/duty changes? As a result of the Colgan Air Accident, the FAA implemented new flight and duty regulations to mitigate the risk of fatigue for aircrews. The regulation incorporates restrictions on flight hours, and it also implements more stringent rest requirements. Among many other things, the new regulation mandates a 10-hour period of rest, with the intention of giving pilots at least 8 hours of uninterrupted sleep within that amount of time. The old regulation had more lax flight hour requirements based on the day and year, whereas the new rule limits flight hours in accordance with the week, month, and per years (Houston, 2017). The FAA has established an exemption for cargo carriers under the Part 117 rules. Limitations vary on the time the pilot begins their day, and incorporates certain limits on flight time when the plane is moving under its own power before, during, or after flight. Additionally, cargo carriers have improved their rest facilities for crewmembers (PNG, 2013).
            I believe that cargo carriers have been excluded from the new changes as a result of the cost that it would take to fulfill that standard. It can cost approximately $297 million to implement the new rule for passenger pilots, which we can all agree is an astronomical price. That being said, there is a greater opportunity of a cost benefit ranging close to $500 million; an opportunity the air cargo industry is not equally susceptible to (PNG, 2013).
            I do not believe cargo carriers should be included in the new rules. Safety should always be a factor and a concern, whether a pilot is transporting one person, one hundred, or just boxes. People will argue that it’s more important for an airline pilot to be concerned about safety because they’re transporting people, but even a pilot transporting household goods has the potential to destroy hundreds of people if that aircraft were to experience a crash. Safety should always be a factor and every pilot should take all necessary precautions, but I do believe the requirements are little too strict for cargo carriers. Air cargo pilots differ from passenger pilots in many ways, to include running shorter flights and operating at various times throughout the night, so the requirements should reflect their operation without compromising safety.
            If the cargo carriers were to be included in the new rules, companies and personnel would suffer significantly. The preexisting gap of qualified pilots would increase for cargo carriers, subsequently resulting in a lack of productivity for companies. From a management perspective, companies would suffer from a loss of personnel and it would drastically decrease their reputation and product output.




References

Houston, S. (2017, November 17). FAA’s Final Rule for Pilot Duty and Rests Requirements. Retrieved from                    https://www.thebalance.com/faa-final-rule-pilot-duty-and-rest-requirements-282927

PNG Logistics (2013, January 29). Rest Requirements For Air Cargo Pilots. Retrieved from

            http://pnglc.com/rest-requirements-for-air-cargo-pilots/

Comments

  1. I like how brief you made your blog. I agree with your opinions, in fact I share them. One of the main things I picked is that if they need to regulate the cargo industry, they need to do so in a way that suits their operations. The clear distinctions between the airlines and cargo should make it so they can't abide by the same restrictions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Final Blog

A couple of months ago I wrote a blog regarding pilots and mental illness. If you can remember, I discussed the 2015 crash of Germanwings Flight 4U9525, and the extremely unfortunate example of the pilot, First Officer Andreas Lubitz, of whom suffered from a mental illness, which subsequently led to his deliberate crashing of Flight 4U9525 into the French Alps, killing all 150 on board (Hammer, 2016). That entire situation could have been avoided if the necessary steps were taken to not only get FO Lubitz the appropriate help he needed, but to also properly report his mental health decline by his family doctor and psychiatrist. For this post, I would like to revisit the mental illness topic, but I would like to switch gears and present a few questions regarding military pilots to include: why is military pilot depression and mental illness far less documented or known compared to the general public? Are their screening processes less stringent? Do more of them simpl

ATC Privatization

Our current Air Traffic Control system, run by the Federal Aviation Administration and funded by Congress, has an airspace comprised of 21 zones divided into individual sectors. These divisions include Air Traffic Control System Command Center (ATCSCC), Air Route Traffic Control Centers (ARTCC), the Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON), Air Traffic Control Towers (ATCT), and Flight Service Stations (FSS) (Freudenrich, 2018). President Trump wants to hand over this infrastructure to a private, nonprofit entity with its own board made up of federal officials, unions, airlines, and airports. The intent is for the FAA to oversee the private entity, which would be funded by user fees such as takeoff and landing charges, as opposed to the preexisting taxes on passenger tickets and fuel (Marshall, 2017).             Regardless of what happens, the Air Traffic Control system is in need of an upgrade. This upgrade comes in the form of what we call the NextGen system. Ne

Global Airlines: Is It a Fair Playing Field?

            The US-UAE Open Skies Agreement is an agreement established by the United States and the United Arab Emirates, allowing like the name suggests, open skies for both parties. Each party grants the other party certain rights and rules to be upheld while conducting their international air transportation, to include, but not limited to: a)      “The right to fly across its territory without landing; b)     The right to make stops in its territory for non-traffic purposes; c)      While entering, within, or leaving the territory of one Party, its laws and regulations relating to the operation and navigation of aircraft shall be complied with by the other Party's airlines; d)     While entering, within, or leaving the territory of one Party, its laws and regulations relating to the admission to or departure from its territory of passengers, crew or cargo on aircraft (including regulations relating to entry, clearance, aviation security, immigration,